Re: patch for small omission in psql \? help

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: patch for small omission in psql \? help
Date: 2009-04-03 23:38:39
Message-ID: 25963.1238801919@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> Happened to notice this while looking for something else; the \ef
> command appears to be missing from \? output. Suggested patch below.

Applied, thanks.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-04-03 23:41:50 Re: psql \d commands and information_schema
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-04-03 23:06:29 Re: question on bits32 wraparound check