Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Put back ERANGE test in dpow().

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Put back ERANGE test in dpow().
Date: 2007-01-06 03:52:17
Message-ID: 25946.1168055537@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> It ERANGE's only on Inf, not underflow? I would prefer:
> else if (errno == ERANGE && !isinf(result))

No objection to that, just don't take out the ERANGE test altogether
again ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-06 04:01:51 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Put back ERANGE test in
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-01-06 03:36:33 pgsql: Remove extra character added to top.

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-06 03:57:32 Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-06 03:21:25 Re: A patch to pg_regress for Windows port