Re: Report relation extension blockers within parallel lock groups

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Report relation extension blockers within parallel lock groups
Date: 2026-09-27 17:22:05
Message-ID: 259331B5-F1CD-426E-8EEB-B61AC79869EC@yandex-team.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 4 Sep 2026, at 10:45, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Your fix looks correct to me, matches deadlock detector code.

Do you think CF entry [0] should be marked RfC?

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

[0] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/7228/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2026-09-27 17:26:08 Re: [PATCH] Add memory/disk usage for Function Scan nodes in EXPLAIN
Previous Message Andrey Borodin 2026-09-27 17:16:51 Re: pg_rewind does not rewind diverging timelines