Re: Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits
Date: 2006-02-09 03:46:46
Message-ID: 25927.1139456806@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Karl O. Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com> writes:
> It would have been nice to have an option to SQL's VACUUM that would
> ignore the cost-based delays so as to bring that database back
> to life as rapidly as possible. (Likewise the vacuumdb shell
> command.)

What's wrong with SET?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris 2006-02-09 03:49:52 Re: What's faster?
Previous Message Silas Justiniano 2006-02-09 03:45:15 What's faster?