Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing
Date: 2006-11-05 18:28:34
Message-ID: 25914.1162751314@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 12:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> After re-reading the above, it strikes me that maybe names based around
>> "freeze_min" and "freeze_max" would be useful?

> Works for me. They are clearly related, yet different and allow a
> straightforward explanation of their need and use.

Sold, I'll rename them before committing the patch.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2006-11-05 19:23:59 NULL in arrays
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-11-05 18:24:55 Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2006-11-05 19:47:28 Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-11-05 18:24:55 Re: Proposal: vacuum and autovacuum parameters to control freezing