| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Klaus Naumann <kn(at)mgnet(dot)de>, markw(at)osdl(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
| Date: | 2004-07-14 13:20:08 |
| Message-ID: | 25903.1089811208@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I've not done power off tests, yet. They need to be done just to
> check...actually you don't need to do this to test PITR...
I agree, power off is not really the point here. What we need to check
into is (a) the mechanics of archiving WAL segments and (b) the
process of restoring given a backup and a bunch of WAL segments.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Wabner | 2004-07-14 13:27:36 | shutdown postgres under windows |
| Previous Message | Claudia Dantas Procopio | 2004-07-14 12:04:16 | Help - Error in createdb |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-07-14 15:04:02 | Re: serverlog rotation/functions |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD | 2004-07-14 09:57:17 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-14 13:35:55 | Re: serverlog rotation/functions |
| Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2004-07-14 08:41:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Is "trust" really a good default? |