From: | Peter Vandivier <petervandivier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16695: pg_hba_file_rules NULL address and netmask |
Date: | 2020-11-02 22:26:25 |
Message-ID: | 258C6CBF-BF3B-4042-B1E2-EC67634C17A0@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Apologies - please find screencaps and context at the following
- https://postgresteam.slack.com/archives/C0FS3UTAP/p1603440839348800
- https://topanswers.xyz/transcript?room=2&id=78663&year=2020&month=10#c78663
By way of description - IP address/netmask pairs given in pg_hba.conf are not read into the system view pg_hba_file_rules even in well formed and default installations. The shell commands given in the initial email are meant to give a minimum reproduction of this behavior when executed on FreeBSD 11
A default install on RHEL querying pg_hba_file_rules would show corresponding non-null values as appropriate
Kind regards
Peter Vandivier
Sent from my iPhone
Please excuse typos and brevity
On Nov 2, 2020, at 22:15, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> pg_hba_file_rules reports NULL address and netmask values incorrectly on
> FreeBSD 11 for tested postgres versions 10-13 (at least). e.g.
This is kind of an unhelpful bug report: you did not show what results
you got, nor what you expected to get.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-11-02 22:50:08 | Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-11-02 22:15:02 | Re: BUG #16695: pg_hba_file_rules NULL address and netmask |