| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GUC description cleanup |
| Date: | 2006-10-26 21:37:47 |
| Message-ID: | 25871.1161898667@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Note that this patch breaks the translations of these strings, so I
> haven't applied it yet. Should I apply it now, or wait for 8.3 to
> branch?
BTW, unless Peter says it's OK, my advice is to wait. It's already
likely to be the case that translation updates are the critical path
for releasing 8.2.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-10-26 21:45:09 | Re: plperl/plperlu interaction |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-26 21:24:37 | Re: plperl/plperlu interaction |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Campbell | 2006-10-26 22:11:59 | Re: Deadlock with pg_dump? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-26 21:21:26 | Re: Deadlock with pg_dump? |