From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Index tuple count != heap tuple count problem identified] |
Date: | 2000-04-06 05:00:22 |
Message-ID: | 25824.954997222@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>>>> Is it wrong to change the implementation of CREATE INDEX ?
>>>> I have a fix.
>>>> It needs the change of duplicate check(tuplesort->btbuild) and
>>>> I've thougth that it would be better to change it after the release
>>>> of 7.0.
>>
>> Well, it seems we better do something about it before 7.0 is released.
>> Now it seems we have to decide to change CREATE INDEX, or modify VACUUM.
> It's difficult for me to provide a fix for CREATE INDEX before 7.0 is
> released.
> It's not sufficiently checked and I don't remember details now.
Also, we'd need to change the other index access methods too. That
doesn't seem to me like a good thing to tackle a week before release...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-04-06 05:03:56 | RE: Index tuple count != heap tuple count problem identified] |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-04-06 04:03:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Doc updates |