Re: KSQO parameter

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: KSQO parameter
Date: 2002-06-18 13:57:41
Message-ID: 25803.1024408661@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> _deadcode is nowadays known as CVS history.

> Agreed, but _deadcode directories still exist, so I put it there.
> Personally, I would like to see all those files removed, but I was
> outvoted last time I asked.

Perhaps we need a revote. I don't like _deadcode one bit ---
having that stuff in the tree just produces a lot of false hits
when I'm searching for things.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2002-06-18 14:07:26 Re: Roadmap for a Win32 port
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2002-06-18 13:24:57 Re: PostGres Doubt

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-18 16:55:32 Re: KSQO parameter
Previous Message Dave Page 2002-06-18 07:22:34 Re: ODBC questions