From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Joe Shevland" <shevlandj(at)kpi(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [JDBC] Possible large object bug? |
Date: | 2001-03-27 01:00:54 |
Message-ID: | 2580.985654854@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
"Joe Shevland" <shevlandj(at)kpi(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Semi-topical I hope ;)
Completely irrelevant to JDBC as far as I can see. I've redirected to
pghackers.
> NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/115: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> ...
> NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6087: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6111: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6112: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6136: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6137: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1.
> pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly.
> This probably means the backend terminated abnormally
> before or while processing the request.
Ugh. It looks like something has clobbered your pg_attribute file.
Was this the first sign of trouble? Can you provide an "od -x" dump of
that file? (It'd be $PGDATA/base/DB2OID/1249; you'll need to look in
pg_database to determine the OID of db2.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marcin Kowalski | 2001-03-27 09:03:07 | pg_dump potential bug |
Previous Message | Joe Shevland | 2001-03-27 00:37:35 | Possible large object bug? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mathijs Brands | 2001-03-27 01:04:50 | Regression test on FBSD 3.3 & 4.2, IRIX 6.5 (was Re: Re: Call for platforms) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-27 00:53:44 | Re: Re: Call for platforms |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2001-03-27 11:04:26 | Re: RE: Compiling |
Previous Message | Joe Shevland | 2001-03-27 00:37:35 | Possible large object bug? |