Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu
Date: 2002-02-11 02:24:16
Message-ID: 25787.1013394256@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> writes:
> freebsd 4.5
> netbsd 1.5.2

> #define RTLD_LAZY 1
> #define RTLD_GLOBAL 0x100

Thanks. Is there an RTLD_NOW symbol on those platforms?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brent Verner 2002-02-11 03:49:23 Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-02-11 02:22:53 Idea for making COPY data Microsoft-proof

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brent Verner 2002-02-11 03:49:23 Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu
Previous Message Brent Verner 2002-02-11 01:42:59 Re: RTLD_LAZY considered harmful (Re: pltlc and pltlcu