| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | prlw1(at)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk |
| Cc: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. |
| Date: | 2000-01-24 17:29:43 |
| Message-ID: | 25723.948734983@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
> Things are still not so good for me. The pg_dumpall > file, psql < file did
> work, but later:
> newnham=> select * from crsids,"tblPerson" where
newnham-> crsids.crsid != "tblPerson"."CRSID";
> Backend sent B message without prior T
> D21Enter data to be copied followed by a newline.
> End with a backslash and a period on a line by itself.
>>>
> which smells like a similar problem. (Note that this is a join. Straight
> selects didn't cause problems)
Bizarre. Obviously, the frontend and backend have gotten out of sync,
but it's not too clear who's to blame. Since you also mention
> (New also, though probably unrelated: the sanity check fails with number of
> index tuples exactly half number in heap - not equal)
I think that you may have some subtle platform-specific problems in the
backend.
What exactly is your platform/compiler/configuration, anyway?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-01-24 17:33:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-24 17:25:29 | Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates |