Re: alternative back-end block formats

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: alternative back-end block formats
Date: 2014-01-28 17:39:58
Message-ID: 25710.1390930798@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> There are a couple of really huge issues that would have to be argued out
>> before any progress could be made.

> Is this something that people want to spend time on right now? As I
> mentioned earlier, I'm game. But it doesn't sound like I'll get very far
> without adult supervision.

TBH, I'd rather we waited till the commitfest is over. This is certainly
material for 9.5, if not even further out, so there's no pressing need for
a debate right now; and we have plenty of stuff we do need to deal with
right now.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-01-28 17:40:12 Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-01-28 17:36:36 Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe