Re: Doc fix and adjustment for MERGE command

From: Vitaly Burovoy <vitaly(dot)burovoy(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doc fix and adjustment for MERGE command
Date: 2022-09-09 11:58:48
Message-ID: 256e5614-3167-6783-c536-3607155e7f0d@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-09-09 11:54Z, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2022-Sep-08, Vik Fearing wrote:
>
>> On 9/7/22 22:51, Vitaly Burovoy wrote:
>>> Hello hackers!
>>>
>>> Reading docs for the MERGE statement I've found a little error: a
>>> semicolon in middle of a statement and absence of a semicolon in the end
>>> of it.
>>>
>>> Key words in subqueries are written in uppercase everywhere in the docs
>>> but not in an example for MERGE. I think it should be adjusted too.
>
>> I agree with both of these patches (especially the semicolon part which is
>> not subjective).
>
> OK, pushed both together.
>

Thank you!
=)

--
Best regards,
Vitaly Burovoy

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2022-09-09 12:06:47 Re: confirmed_flush_lsn shows LSN of the data that has not yet been received by the logical subscriber.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-09-09 11:58:39 Re: MERGE and parsing with prepared statements