| From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Recent spam on general |
| Date: | 2012-04-12 19:05:39 |
| Message-ID: | 2569781263e224232166736b89621fa2@biglumber.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
> You're looking at the wrong header. Our spam score gave it 2.1. Which
> is still not very much, but a lot better than minus 3.6..
Oops, you are right. I think I have a -5 whitelist for the PG lists,
which means it is 2.6, not that far from 2.1. Hardly one of the
more disguised spams I've ever seen, so I think everyone should
be doing better.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201204121502
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAk+HJ3AACgkQvJuQZxSWSsgQkACg8SiO7yyrT5yXkv2a6vp/WpPe
DX8An3Jp6svEA+wpxPFiLq3jmWrkhH55
=V5ef
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | damien clochard | 2012-04-16 20:59:50 | pgfoundry down (again) |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-04-12 18:32:13 | Re: Recent spam on general |