Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On 11/2/14 11:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Committed patch looks good, but should we also add the stanza we discussed
>> in Makefile.global.in concerning defining $(prove) in terms of "missing"
>> if we didn't find it? I think the behavior of HEAD when you ask for
>> --enable-tap-tests but don't have "prove" might be less than ideal.
> configure will now fail when "prove" is not found.
If there's a commit that goes with this statement, you neglected to push it...
regards, tom lane