Re: Win32 signals & sockets

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Win32 signals & sockets
Date: 2004-11-16 21:20:57
Message-ID: 2562.1100640057@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

"Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> writes:
> I've been following this thread for a bit and I have to admit I wouldn't
> mind seeing the shmmem part of Magnus's patch go in. Windows suffers vs
> unix generally on process creation times and any improvement here would
> be welcome.

[ grumble... ] OK, as long as Magnus is promising a code-beautification
patch. postmaster.c is rapidly approaching a condition of unreadability
== unmaintainability.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-11-16 21:26:17 Re: Win32 signals & sockets
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2004-11-16 21:02:53 Re: Win32 signals & sockets