Re: stress test for parallel workers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Wong <mark(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: stress test for parallel workers
Date: 2020-08-24 13:43:53
Message-ID: 2560254.1598276633@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> For our archives' sake: today I got seemingly-automated mail informing me
> that this patch has been merged into the 4.19-stable, 5.4-stable,
> 5.7-stable, and 5.8-stable kernel branches; but not 4.4-stable,
> 4.9-stable, or 4.14-stable, because it failed to apply.

And this morning's mail brought news that the latter three branches
are now patched as well. So I guess at this point it's down to
platform vendors as to whether or how fast they absorb such changes.

It might help for us to file platform-specific bug reports asking
for the change to be merged.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-08-24 13:45:42 Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..."
Previous Message John Naylor 2020-08-24 13:38:06 Re: Problems with the FSM, heap fillfactor, and temporal locality