Re: pg_streamrecv for 9.1?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_streamrecv for 9.1?
Date: 2010-12-29 18:01:54
Message-ID: 25572.1293645714@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:47:53AM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Would people be interested in putting pg_streamrecv
>> (http://github.com/mhagander/pg_streamrecv) in bin/ or contrib/ for
>> 9.1? I think it would make sense to do so.

> +1 for bin/

Is it really stable enough for bin/? My impression of the state of
affairs is that there is nothing whatsoever about replication that
is really stable yet.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-12-29 18:05:00 Re: SSI memory mitigation & false positive degradation
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-12-29 17:57:05 Re: SSI memory mitigation & false positive degradation