Re: SET LOCAL again

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SET LOCAL again
Date: 2002-07-26 15:09:29
Message-ID: 25572.1027696169@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> As an alternative syntax I can suggest

> SET name TO value [ ON COMMIT RESET ];

Ugh. Why can't we stick with SET LOCAL?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc Lavergne 2002-07-26 15:11:44 Re: Oracle Decode Function
Previous Message Roderick A. Anderson 2002-07-26 14:33:43 Re: Password sub-process ...