Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> Additionally, if someone eventually fixes the index-ownership situation,
> the changes to command.c to remove the index recursion are trivial.
... but won't necessarily get done. More to the point, they may confuse
someone who's trying to refactor the code: without careful thought, he
might think he needs to support recursion over indexes as well as child
tables.
> This patch also includes some refactoring and code cleanups that are
> useful in any case.
Sure. Please resubmit just that part.
regards, tom lane