Re: Re :Solaris Performance

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark kirkwood <markir(at)slingshot(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: "P(dot)J(dot) Josh Rovero" <rovero(at)sonalysts(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re :Solaris Performance
Date: 2002-02-05 16:48:03
Message-ID: 25560.1012927683@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Mark kirkwood <markir(at)slingshot(dot)co(dot)nz> writes:
> The problem area I have experienced is that queries that require a
> reasonable sort at some point of the plan (e.g have a GROUP BY) will
> consume all one 1 cpu (box had 2 of them) for a _very_ long time (e.g.
> 30 minutes - using either compiler) whereas the same query on a (single
> cpu) Intel/Linux takes about 1 minute.

[ scratches head ... ] I didn't think there was anything particularly
system-dependent about the sorting code. Have you tried profiling, or
anything to determine where the Solaris version is spending its time?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vivek Khera 2002-02-05 17:03:57 Re: Indices for foreign keys
Previous Message Ben-Nes Michael 2002-02-05 16:41:16 Re: caculating while select - maybe sum ?