| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marcel Gsteiger" <Marcel(dot)Gsteiger(at)milprog(dot)ch> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Problems with information_schema |
| Date: | 2004-12-12 06:33:39 |
| Message-ID: | 25544.1102833219@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Marcel Gsteiger" <Marcel(dot)Gsteiger(at)milprog(dot)ch> writes:
> Is this a known problem? If the problem is unknown, I could probably help to find out what's going wrong. The base tables (in schema pg_catalog) appear to be ok at first sight. Perhaps the information_schema dictionary views have not yet been debugged yet?
AFAIK all the information_schema changes since 7.4 are quite
intentional. Rather than pointing out that it's changed, you need to
show us an example where you think the new behavior is wrong.
(And please do so ASAP, because if 8.0 goes final next week, it'll be
quite hard to fix later ...)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Elnaz Shafipour | 2004-12-12 06:56:24 | Re: relation "sql_features" does not exist |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-12 06:27:46 | Re: [GENERAL] replacing a view: bug or feature? |