| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <asmodai(at)wxs(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 64-bit pgsql |
| Date: | 2003-09-05 16:28:58 |
| Message-ID: | 25521.1062779338@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <asmodai(at)wxs(dot)nl> writes:
> Using a snapshot of September the 4th:
> creating template1 database in /p/scratch/asmodai/postgresql-snapshot/src/test/r
> egress/./tmp_check/data/base/1... FATAL: could not create semaphores: No space
> left on device
> DETAIL: Failed syscall was semget(4, 17, 03600).
> I mean, I just want to know if you guys still want to support the low
> SysV settings. If not I just need to ask the admins of the system in
> question to bump the values a bit.
If it dies even at max_connections 10, that is a *lower* setting than we
ever supported before (the pre-7.4 default was 32, and you need 20 or
more to run the parallel regression test). I suspect that you actually
don't have SysV semaphores enabled at all on that machine. There would
be no point in trying any smaller values.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mendola Gaetano | 2003-09-05 16:29:12 | Re: Planning to force reindex of hash indexes |
| Previous Message | luke | 2003-09-05 16:27:29 | win32 |