Re: Lack of use of indexes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Don Isgitt <djisgitt(at)soundenergy(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Lack of use of indexes
Date: 2002-11-22 17:31:05
Message-ID: 25445.1037986265@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Don Isgitt <djisgitt(at)soundenergy(dot)com> writes:
> gds2=# explain select * from lg where section=14;
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:

> Seq Scan on lg (cost=0.00..5885.77 rows=3836 width=73)

> EXPLAIN
> gds2=# set enable_seqscan=off;
> SET VARIABLE
> gds2=# explain select * from lg where section=14;
> NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:

> Index Scan using lgsec on lg (cost=0.00..12167.45 rows=3836 width=73)

> EXPLAIN

Of course, the above only proves that the planner thinks the indexscan
will be slower ;-). You should try EXPLAIN ANALYZE to see how well the
planner estimates square up with reality ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Isgitt 2002-11-22 17:34:19 Re: Lack of use of indexes
Previous Message snpe 2002-11-22 17:30:35 Re: Question about DEADLOCK