Re: Two-phase commit issues

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two-phase commit issues
Date: 2005-05-20 16:07:06
Message-ID: 25406.1116605226@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I am a little confused by this. How does two-phase commit add extra
> requirements on crash recovery?

Uh, that's more or less the entire *POINT*. Once an open transaction is
prepared, it's supposed to survive a server crash.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-20 16:20:38 Re: [GENERAL] Image storage questions
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-20 15:58:44 Re: 8.02 rpm error