Re: Snapshot management, final

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Snapshot management, final
Date: 2008-05-06 21:59:11
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-patches

I wrote:
> Also, I don't think the subtransaction management is correct at all.

BTW, maybe it would make more sense to keep the reference count
management inside ResourceOwners, instead of having a largely
duplicative set of logic in snapmgr.c.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-05-06 22:19:20 Re: [GENERAL] psql \pset pager
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-05-06 21:44:44 Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches