Re: RULE regression test fragility?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Mike Blackwell <mike(dot)blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RULE regression test fragility?
Date: 2013-10-24 13:22:52
Message-ID: 25381.1382620972@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> FWIW, I've repeatedly now thought that it'd make maintaining/updating
> patches easier if we switched that query into unaligned tuple only (\a
> \t) mode. That would remove the frequent conflicts on the row count and
> widespread changes due to changed alignment.
> Alternatively we could just wrap the query in \copy ... CSV.

Hm ... yeah, it would be a good thing if changes in one view didn't so
frequently have ripple effects to the whole output. Not sure which
format is best for that though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-10-24 13:54:52 Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement
Previous Message ktm@rice.edu 2013-10-24 13:12:42 Re: CLUSTER FREEZE