From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patch application |
Date: | 2001-03-19 20:56:47 |
Message-ID: | 25373.985035407@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc pgsql-odbc |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I understand the formalistic problem, and maybe I overstated its
> formality, but it seems it would be good to maintain a list for two
> reasons:
I don't have a problem with keeping an informal list of area experts.
I was just objecting to the notion of formal signoffs (I doubt Peter E.
wants to look at every single Makefile change, for example).
Also, there's a point that keeps coming up in these discussions: the
standards need to be different depending on what time of the release
cycle it is. Perhaps formal signoffs *are* appropriate when we're
this late in beta.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Lance Taylor | 2001-03-19 20:57:19 | Re: Patch application |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-19 20:39:24 | Re: Patch application |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Lance Taylor | 2001-03-19 20:57:19 | Re: Patch application |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-19 20:39:24 | Re: Patch application |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Lance Taylor | 2001-03-19 20:57:19 | Re: Patch application |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-19 20:39:24 | Re: Patch application |