Mark Knox <segfault(at)hardline(dot)org> writes:
> Well, this patch seems to produce attlens of 6 as desired, but it
> causes many (13) of the regression tests to fail. Do you want to see
> the regression.diffs?
> See attached.
Does look pretty broken, but I don't see how my idea would have led to
all this other stuff failing. Anyway, I guess the path of least
resistance is to install your ARM-specific packing patch. It's
important to make sure that sizeof(ItemPointerData) is 6 if at all
possible, since it will cost you four or so wasted bytes in every
tuple header if it's not. Will take care of it for RC2.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Mikheev, Vadim||Date: 2001-03-30 05:17:50|
|Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Re: possible row locking bug in 7.0.3 & 7.1|
|Previous:||From: Matthew||Date: 2001-03-30 04:56:19|
|Subject: RE: User administration tool|