Re: unlogged tables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unlogged tables
Date: 2010-12-07 18:17:56
Message-ID: 25335.1291745876@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm also going to go through and change all instances of the word
> "unlogged" to "volatile", per previous discussion. If this seems like
> a bad idea to anyone, please object now rather than afterwards.

Hm... I thought there had been discussion of a couple of different
flavors of table volatility. Is it really a good idea to commandeer
the word "volatile" for this particular one?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-12-07 18:31:22 Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes
Previous Message Dmitriy Igrishin 2010-12-07 18:17:28 Re: Feature request - CREATE TYPE ... WITH OID = oid_number.