Re: [HACKERS] "Adding missing from clause" (replacement)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "Adding missing from clause" (replacement)
Date: 2003-06-12 02:34:15
Message-ID: 25269.1055385255@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> Does someone want to make an argument that this variable should default
>> to false rather than true, for standards compliance?

> No. As much as I would like it to default to FALSE, we need to maintain
> backward compatibility for one release. We can change the default in
> 7.5/8.0.

Much further out than that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2003-06-12 05:34:28 Re: Pre-allocation of shared memory ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-12 02:02:44 Re: Linux startup script

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-06-12 03:36:47 Synopsis inconsistencies
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-12 02:33:07 Re: Nested transactions: deferred triggers