Re: First draft of back-branch release notes is done

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: First draft of back-branch release notes is done
Date: 2023-02-05 20:44:13
Message-ID: 2526623.1675629853@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 8:57 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Also, aren't shared tuplestores used in more places than just
>> parallel hash join? I mentioned that as an example, not an
>> exhaustive list of trouble spots.

> Shared file sets (= a directory of temp files with automatic cleanup)
> are used by more things, but shared tuplestores (= a shared file set
> with a tuple-oriented interface on top, to support partial scan) are
> currently only used by PHJ.

Oh, okay. I'll change it to say "corruption within parallel hash
join", then, and not use the word "tuplestore" at all.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2023-02-05 20:49:32 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2023-02-05 20:37:10 Re: First draft of back-branch release notes is done