signed, volatile, etc

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: signed, volatile, etc
Date: 2000-08-27 20:13:40
Message-ID: 25259.967407220@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL <petere(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> Remove configure tests for `signed', `volatile', and signal handler args;
> the harm potential outweighs the possible benefits.

Ahem. Should this change not have been discussed *before* making it?
I am sure you have just broken some ports to older systems. You need
to justify doing that. Where is the "harm potential"?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-08-27 21:48:01 pgsql/src/backend/storage/file (fd.c)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian - CVS 2000-08-27 19:25:32 pgsql/doc/src/FAQ (FAQ.html)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2000-08-27 20:25:19 Re: Why?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-08-27 19:42:52 Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)