Re: Document if width_bucket's low and high are inclusive/exclusive

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
Cc: Ben Peachey Higdon <bpeacheyhigdon(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Document if width_bucket's low and high are inclusive/exclusive
Date: 2025-06-20 21:19:21
Message-ID: 2525554.1750454361@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

I wrote:
> Another thing I just remembered (think I knew it once) is the
> behavior of the first form when low > high. It's not an error!

So concretely, how about the attached? In addition to what we
mentioned so far, I made the sentence about out-of-range cases
more explicit.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Document-width_bucket-range-as-inclusive-exclusiv.patch text/x-diff 2.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Drake 2025-06-20 21:21:36 Re: Cleanup of syntax.sgml
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2025-06-20 20:59:55 Re: Cleanup of syntax.sgml