Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)" <postgresql(at)mailpen(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster
Date: 2021-05-31 04:44:27
Message-ID: 2524029.1622436267@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

"Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)" <postgresql(at)mailpen(dot)com> writes:
> I thought that having a "USING" clause, was semantically equivalent to
> an "ON" clause with the equalities explicitly stated.  So no, I didn't
> try that.

USING is not that, or at least not only that ... read the manual.

I'm wondering if what you saw is some side-effect of the aliasing
that USING does.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-05-31 05:09:16 Re: Bracket, brace, parenthesis
Previous Message Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) 2021-05-31 04:23:43 Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) 2021-05-31 05:24:00 Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster
Previous Message Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) 2021-05-31 04:23:43 Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster