| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: snapshot generation broken |
| Date: | 2010-09-22 14:50:14 |
| Message-ID: | 25232.1285167014@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> I think this should be working now. I made this change to mk-snapshot,
>> and a similar one to mk-stable_snapshot. I have run the snapshot
>> generation for master, and the one for 8.4 should finish in a
>> minute or so. I have disabled the cronjobs until someone else has
>> verified the tarballs.
Do you still need someone to do that, and what do you want done exactly?
>> When I do, I'll also enable generation of snapshots of REL9_0_STABLE.
>> We currently do back to 8.2 - should we keep that, or drop 8.2?
> hmm I would say we should do all supported branches because those are
> the ones that people might be interested in when looking for a fix on a
> branch...
FWIW, I think back to 8.2 is sufficient. The branches earlier than that
are going to be unsupported in a matter of weeks anyway. And if no one
has complained about the lack of nightly tarballs for them to date,
it's unlikely that they'll start complaining now.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-09-22 14:57:24 | Re: snapshot generation broken |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-22 14:45:30 | Re: SQLSTATE of notice PGresult |