Re: BUG #14057: vacuum setting reltuples=0 for tables with >0 tuples

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #14057: vacuum setting reltuples=0 for tables with >0 tuples
Date: 2017-03-16 21:28:24
Message-ID: 25230.1489699704@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> "Andres" == Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Andres> Seems like a good thing to include in the tree. I'd be ok with
> Andres> just including the simpler version in the relevant branches.

> Ok.

I dunno ... there doesn't seem to be any meaningful portability risk
here, and it's not clear to me what class of future bug this test might
hope to catch. Do we really need to spend test cycles forevermore on
this?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-03-16 21:35:55 Re: BUG #14057: vacuum setting reltuples=0 for tables with >0 tuples
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2017-03-16 21:17:43 Re: BUG #14057: vacuum setting reltuples=0 for tables with >0 tuples