Re: Insertion to temp table deteriorating over time

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Steven Flatt" <steven(dot)flatt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Insertion to temp table deteriorating over time
Date: 2006-12-14 21:23:16
Message-ID: 25209.1166131396@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Steven Flatt" <steven(dot)flatt(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Regarding your other email -- interesting -- but we are vacuuming pg_class
> every hour. So I don't think the answer lies there...

That's good, but is the vacuum actually accomplishing anything? I'm
wondering if there's also a long-running transaction in the mix.
Try a manual "VACUUM VERBOSE pg_class;" after the thing has slowed down,
and see what it says about removable and nonremovable rows.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Staubo 2006-12-14 22:39:55 Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2006-12-14 21:21:11 Re: File Systems Compared