Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> writes:
> Not enough. Here is a v14 which might improve things further more again.
> Sorry for this noise due to blind windows tests.
Just FTR, I strongly object to your removal of process-startup srandom()
calls. Those are not only setting the seed for our own use, but also
ensuring that things like random() calls within PL functions or other
libraries aren't 100% predictable.
regards, tom lane