Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)partitur(dot)se>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?
Date: 2002-01-04 04:03:11
Message-ID: 2518.1010116991@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)partitur(dot)se> writes:
> I am preparing the update of the FreeBSD port of PostgreSQL with the
> upcoming 7.2, and I'm just wondering: is there any performance penalty
> intoduced by including --with-ssl in the default configure args?

Failure to build/run if SSL libraries are not available?

AFAIK there is no run-time penalty, especially not if the server is
started without the enable-ssl switch. But there had better be an
SSL library to link with.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-01-04 04:08:16 Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?
Previous Message Palle Girgensohn 2002-01-04 03:43:22 Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?