Re: Valgrind-detected bug in partitioning code

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Valgrind-detected bug in partitioning code
Date: 2017-01-20 21:02:51
Message-ID: 25135.1484946171@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Hmm. That's bad. I kind of wonder how sane it is to think that we
> can invoke SQL-callable functions during a relcache reload, because
> couldn't we be processing an invalidation in the context of an aborted
> transaction?

You're doing WHAT?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-01-20 21:12:47 Re: Valgrind-detected bug in partitioning code
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-01-20 21:01:37 Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch