| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tim McAuley <mcauleyt(at)tcd(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
| Date: | 2003-09-26 18:08:10 |
| Message-ID: | 25111.1064599690@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> so it appears that cygwin's "echo" generates a different newline style
>> than what got put into sql_features.txt. A possible way to fix this is
>> to put the "\." line into sql_features.txt, but maybe there's a cleaner
>> answer. Peter, any thoughts?
> There's no clean answer to this on Cygwin. This specific case is just a
> little problem that we could solve locally, but in general you'll just end
> up annoying people if you require them to use consistent line endings on
> Cygwin.
Yeah, I was wondering whether you wouldn't propose dropping the newline
consistency check. I'm not very comfortable with that, but maybe we
should. Bruce?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ned Lilly | 2003-09-26 18:10:22 | Metapa - PostgreSQL/Linux clustering for BI |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-26 18:07:46 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ned Lilly | 2003-09-26 18:10:22 | Metapa - PostgreSQL/Linux clustering for BI |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-26 18:07:46 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-26 18:12:39 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-26 18:07:46 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |