Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tim McAuley <mcauleyt(at)tcd(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Date: 2003-09-26 18:07:46
Message-ID: 200309261807.h8QI7k120456@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > so it appears that cygwin's "echo" generates a different newline style
> > than what got put into sql_features.txt. A possible way to fix this is
> > to put the "\." line into sql_features.txt, but maybe there's a cleaner
> > answer. Peter, any thoughts?
>
> There's no clean answer to this on Cygwin. This specific case is just a
> little problem that we could solve locally, but in general you'll just end
> up annoying people if you require them to use consistent line endings on
> Cygwin.

This error is coming from the new 7.4 COPY code that allows \r\n as a
line terminator. Requiring the end-of-line to be consistent seemed to
be the only way to be sure we were not eating a literal carriage return
in the data stream. Let's put the "\." into sql_features.txt and see if
that fixes it, or can we use echo -c "\.\n" in initdb?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-26 18:08:10 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-26 17:58:21 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-26 18:08:10 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-26 18:05:36 Re: 2-phase commit

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-26 18:08:10 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-09-26 17:58:21 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)