| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> | 
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tim McAuley <mcauleyt(at)tcd(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) | 
| Date: | 2003-09-26 18:07:46 | 
| Message-ID: | 200309261807.h8QI7k120456@candle.pha.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc | 
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
> 
> > so it appears that cygwin's "echo" generates a different newline style
> > than what got put into sql_features.txt.  A possible way to fix this is
> > to put the "\." line into sql_features.txt, but maybe there's a cleaner
> > answer.  Peter, any thoughts?
> 
> There's no clean answer to this on Cygwin.  This specific case is just a
> little problem that we could solve locally, but in general you'll just end
> up annoying people if you require them to use consistent line endings on
> Cygwin.
This error is coming from the new 7.4 COPY code that allows \r\n as a
line terminator.  Requiring the end-of-line to be consistent seemed to
be the only way to be sure we were not eating a literal carriage return
in the data stream.  Let's put the "\." into sql_features.txt and see if
that fixes it, or can we use echo -c "\.\n" in initdb?
-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-26 18:08:10 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) | 
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-09-26 17:58:21 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) | 
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-26 18:08:10 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) | 
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-26 18:05:36 | Re: 2-phase commit | 
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-26 18:08:10 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) | 
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-09-26 17:58:21 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |