Re: Not quite a security hole in internal_in

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Not quite a security hole in internal_in
Date: 2009-06-09 18:29:35
Message-ID: 25109.1244572175@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Can we hold it till 8.4.1? Or is that not an option?

What advantage would that have? We certainly wouldn't wish to put a
catversion change into 8.4.1.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-06-09 18:33:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cursor with hold emits the same row more than once across commits in 8.3.7
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-06-09 18:26:03 Re: information_schema.columns changes needed for OLEDB