Re: pre_load_libraries

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marc Munro <marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pre_load_libraries
Date: 2006-07-13 03:31:01
Message-ID: 2508.1152761461@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc Munro <marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com> writes:
> ... A better solution from my point of view would be
> to simply move the call to process_preload_libraries to a point after
> shared memory has been set up. Is there some reason this could not be
> done?

That would make it impossible for a preloaded library to request any
shared memory of its own --- something that admittedly we don't have a
hook to support, but do we want to foreclose it permanently?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2006-07-13 03:42:21 Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2006-07-13 03:04:32 Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze