Re: idea: log_statement_sample_rate - bottom limit for sampling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: idea: log_statement_sample_rate - bottom limit for sampling
Date: 2019-08-04 19:16:12
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> OK, I have the revert ready. The one thing I'm wondering about is
> whether we need to revert log_transaction_sample_rate too? I think it's
> pretty much independent feature, so I think we can keep that. Opinions?

Isn't the issue here the interaction between log_transaction_sample_rate
and log_min_duration_statement? Seems like we have that question
regardless of whether log_statement_sample_limit exists.

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-08-04 19:20:34 Re: pglz performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-08-04 19:14:07 Re: Patch to clean Query after rewrite-and-analyze - reduces memusage up to 50% - increases TPS by up to 50%