Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Win32 port list" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item
Date: 2004-11-01 20:47:28
Message-ID: 25077.1099342048@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> Basically, I think internal_forkexec() needs to be split up into two -
> one win32 and one other. For win32 version, it needs to CreateProcess()
> *before* it does write_backend_variables(), and then pass the process id
> as a parameter to write_backend_vars().

Huh? Why?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2004-11-01 20:53:45 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2004-11-01 20:38:43 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2004-11-01 20:53:45 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2004-11-01 20:38:43 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 lost signals open item