Re: Sort Refinement

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sort Refinement
Date: 2008-03-20 22:08:02
Message-ID: 25058.1206050882@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Currently, our sort algorithm assumes that its input is unsorted. So if
> your data is sorted on (a) and you would like it to be sorted on (a,b)
> then we need to perform the full sort of (a,b).

Simon, would it be too much to ask that you concentrate on reviewing
existing patches during commit fest? Trying to get people to think
about random new ideas is about the most direct undermining of the
commit-fest concept that I can think of. Save 'em for later.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-03-20 22:15:32 Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCHES] 64-bit CommandIds]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-20 21:47:34 Re: [PATCHES] [GENERAL] Empty arrays with ARRAY[]